Leaf
Exchanging Ideas on Climate
National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy
www.nrtee-trnee.ca
Exchanging ideas on Climate
Achieving 2050: A Carbon Pricing Policy for Canada (Technical Report)

« Previous -- Next »

5.0 The Design of Carbon Pricing Instruments

  • Policy design decisions have trade-offs and implications for how well the policy
    1) provides broad, uniform coverage and 2) addresses the risks of adverse outcomes.

An instrument to implement a price on carbon emissions is the central element of a carbon pricing policy to achieve Canada’s emission reduction targets at least cost. Design of a pricing instrument, however, is complex. There are multiple dimensions to carbon pricing policy design, and policy makers must make design choices in several key areas. This includes choosing to balance emission price or reduction quantity, determining how revenue from the policy will be used or permits allocated, or including or excluding mechanisms such as border adjustments.

To achieve cost-effective reductions, a carbon pricing instrument must implement a unified price signal as broadly as possible. Detailed design choices for the pricing instrument can affect how well this unified price signal is applied. Yet the design must also address risks of adverse competitiveness and distributional effects (these possible impacts are discussed in Chapter 8.0). The design problem is challenging, however, because design choices involve trade-offs for how well the policy addresses these different and competing issues.

This chapter assesses how various design decisions affect how carbon pricing policy can 1) provide broad, uniform coverage, and 2) address adverse competitiveness and distributional impacts. To evaluate trade-offs between alternative design choices, five evaluation criteria set out in Section 2.2.1 are used. Not every design choice has implications for every evaluation criteria, so only relevant trade-offs for each section are described.

Table of Contents

Adobe PDF version (3.07 Mb)

Achieving 2050

 


Policy Evaluation Criteria

  • Environmental Effectiveness is a measure of how a design choice affects whether a carbon pricing policy will achieve the emission reduction targets.

  • Economic Efficiency is a measure of how a choice affects the cost-effectiveness of a carbon pricing policy; efficiency means meeting emission reductions at least cost.

  • Distributional Effects is a measure of impact on equity and the extent to which some stakeholders are affected more adversely than others.

  • Political Acceptability is a measure of likely support politicians would find to implement a policy option.

  • Administrative Feasibility is a measure of the burden of implementing and reporting, monitoring, and enforcing a policy over time.

Key design decisions and trade-offs between sets of policy options for each of these decisions are described and evaluated in this chapter, as follows:

  • The section on balancing price and quantity certainty explores how design elements such as price ceilings, intensity caps and adjusting taxes ensure emission reduction targets are achieved, but costs are contained and adverse impacts are mitigated.

  • The section on point of regulation explores options for where in the fuel supply chain a carbon pricing policy is applied. This design decision has implications for how broadly the price signal is applied.

  • The section on revenue recycling explores options for distributing the value of emissions, in terms of allocating either emission permits or revenue collected. Revenue recycling decisions have complex trade-offs between the cost-effectiveness of the policy and how adverse impacts can be addressed.

  • The section on offsets explores options for broadening coverage to improve cost-effectiveness.

  • The section on border adjustments explores options for trade policy mechanisms to address adverse competitiveness impacts.

« Previous -- Next »